You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound unilateral thalamotomy for medically refractory essential tremor: 3-year follow-up data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2024.1360035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefano Tamburin, Fabio Paio, Tommaso Bovi, Giorgia Bulgarelli, Michele Longhi, Roberto Foroni, Elisa Mantovani, Paolo Maria Polloniato, Micaela Tagliamonte, Emanuele Zivelonghi, Chiara Zucchella, Carlo Cavedon, Antonio Nicolato, Benedetto Petralia, Francesco Sala, Bruno Bonetti, Michele Tinazzi, Stefania Montemezzi, Giuseppe Kenneth Ricciardi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,801,424
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,495
of 14,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,782
of 174,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#6
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.