↓ Skip to main content

Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain: Perceptual and Behavioral Phenomena Reported in the Old and New Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain: Perceptual and Behavioral Phenomena Reported in the Old and New Literature
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aslihan Selimbeyoglu, Josef Parvizi

Abstract

In this review, we summarize the subjective experiential phenomena and behavioral changes that are caused by electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex or subcortical nuclei in awake and conscious human subjects. Our comprehensive review contains a detailed summary of the data obtained from electrical brain stimulation (EBS) in humans in the last 100 years. Findings from the EBS studies may provide an additional layer of information about the neural correlates of cognition and behavior in healthy human subjects, or the neuroanatomy of illusions and hallucinations in patients with psychosis and the brain symptomatogenic zones in patients with epilepsy. We discuss some fundamental concepts, issues, and remaining questions that have defined the field of EBS, and review the current state of knowledge about the mechanism of action of EBS suggesting that the modulation of activity within a localized, but distributed, neuroanatomical network might explain the perceptual and behavioral phenomena that are reported during focal electrical stimulation of the human brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 4%
United Kingdom 4 1%
France 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 326 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Master 30 8%
Other 20 5%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 78 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 17%
Psychology 57 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 13%
Engineering 23 6%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 59 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,160,608
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#541
of 7,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,952
of 166,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.