↓ Skip to main content

Worth a Glance: Using Eye Movements to Investigate the Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Worth a Glance: Using Eye Movements to Investigate the Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah E. Hannula, Robert R. Althoff, David E. Warren, Lily Riggs, Neal J. Cohen, Jennifer D. Ryan

Abstract

Results of several investigations indicate that eye movements can reveal memory for elements of previous experience. These effects of memory on eye movement behavior can emerge very rapidly, changing the efficiency and even the nature of visual processing without appealing to verbal reports and without requiring conscious recollection. This aspect of eye movement based memory investigations is particularly useful when eye movement methods are used with special populations (e.g., young children, elderly individuals, and patients with severe amnesia), and also permits use of comparable paradigms in animals and humans, helping to bridge different memory literatures and permitting cross-species generalizations. Unique characteristics of eye movement methods have produced findings that challenge long-held views about the nature of memory, its organization in the brain, and its failures in special populations. Recently, eye movement methods have been successfully combined with neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI, single-unit recording, and magnetoencephalography, permitting more sophisticated investigations of memory. Ultimately, combined use of eye-tracking with neuropsychological and neuroimaging methods promises to provide a more comprehensive account of brain-behavior relationships and adheres to the "converging evidence" approach to cognitive neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 443 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 21%
Student > Master 66 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 64 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 64 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 209 45%
Neuroscience 60 13%
Engineering 27 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 90 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#12,907,471
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,673
of 7,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,326
of 163,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#39
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.