You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generative Models of Cortical Oscillations: Neurobiological Implications of the Kuramoto Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Breakspear, Stewart Heitmann, Andreas Daffertshofer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 442 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 26% |
| Researcher | 101 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 100 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 59 | 12% |
| Engineering | 51 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 19% |
| Unknown | 89 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,874,288
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,777
of 7,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,601
of 178,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#22
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.