↓ Skip to main content

Visual Evoked Responses During Standing and Walking

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual Evoked Responses During Standing and Walking
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Gramann, Joseph T. Gwin, Nima Bigdely-Shamlo, Daniel P. Ferris, Scott Makeig

Abstract

Human cognition has been shaped both by our body structure and by its complex interactions with its environment. Our cognition is thus inextricably linked to our own and others' motor behavior. To model brain activity associated with natural cognition, we propose recording the concurrent brain dynamics and body movements of human subjects performing normal actions. Here we tested the feasibility of such a mobile brain/body (MoBI) imaging approach by recording high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and body movements of subjects standing or walking on a treadmill while performing a visual oddball response task. Independent component analysis of the EEG data revealed visual event-related potentials that during standing, slow walking, and fast walking did not differ across movement conditions, demonstrating the viability of recording brain activity accompanying cognitive processes during whole body movement. Non-invasive and relatively low-cost MoBI studies of normal, motivated actions might improve understanding of interactions between brain and body dynamics leading to more complete biological models of cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 5 2%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 273 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 24%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 18%
Engineering 43 15%
Neuroscience 43 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 58 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#914,223
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#407
of 7,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,374
of 172,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.