↓ Skip to main content

Aberrant Effective Connectivity in Schizophrenia Patients during Appetitive Conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aberrant Effective Connectivity in Schizophrenia Patients during Appetitive Conditioning
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu, Jimmy Jensen, Hongye Wang, Matthäus Willeit, Mahesh Menon, Shitij Kapur, Anthony R. McIntosh

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that schizophrenia involves dysfunction in brain connectivity at a neural level, and a dysfunction in reward processing at a behavioral level. The purpose of the present study was to link these two levels of analyses by examining effective connectivity patterns between brain regions mediating reward learning in patients with schizophrenia and healthy, age-matched controls. To this aim, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and galvanic skin recordings (GSR) while patients and controls performed an appetitive conditioning experiment with visual cues as the conditioned (CS) stimuli, and monetary reward as the appetitive unconditioned stimulus (US). Based on explicit stimulus contingency ratings, conditioning occurred in both groups; however, based on implicit, physiological GSR measures, patients failed to show differences between CS+ and CS- conditions. Healthy controls exhibited increased blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity across striatal, hippocampal, and prefrontal regions and increased effective connectivity from the ventral striatum to the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC BA 11) in the CS+ compared to the CS- condition. Compared to controls, patients showed increased BOLD activity across a similar network of brain regions, and increased effective connectivity from the striatum to hippocampus and prefrontal regions in the CS- compared to the CS+ condition. The findings of increased BOLD activity and effective connectivity in response to the CS- in patients with schizophrenia offer insight into the aberrant assignment of motivational salience to non-reinforced stimuli during conditioning that is thought to accompany schizophrenia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 47 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 25%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 53 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2011.
All research outputs
#14,723,579
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,905
of 7,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,560
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#77
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.