↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation of Executive Functioning in Patients with Frontal Lobe Brain Damage with Goal Management Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
530 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation of Executive Functioning in Patients with Frontal Lobe Brain Damage with Goal Management Training
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Levine, Tom A. Schweizer, Charlene O'Connor, Gary Turner, Susan Gillingham, Donald T. Stuss, Tom Manly, Ian H. Robertson

Abstract

Executive functioning deficits due to brain disease affecting frontal lobe functions cause significant real-life disability, yet solid evidence in support of executive functioning interventions is lacking. Goal Management Training (GMT), an executive functioning intervention that draws upon theories concerning goal processing and sustained attention, has received empirical support in studies of patients with traumatic brain injury, normal aging, and case studies. GMT promotes a mindful approach to complex real-life tasks that pose problems for patients with executive functioning deficits, with a main goal of periodically stopping ongoing behavior to monitor and adjust goals. In this controlled trial, an expanded version of GMT was compared to an alternative intervention, Brain Health Workshop that was matched to GMT on non-specific characteristics that can affect intervention outcome. Participants included 19 individuals in the chronic phase of recovery from brain disease (predominantly stroke) affecting frontal lobe function. Outcome data indicated specific effects of GMT on the Sustained Attention to Response Task as well as the Tower Test, a visuospatial problem-solving measure that reflected far transfer of training effects. There were no significant effects on self-report questionnaires, likely owing to the complexity of these measures in this heterogeneous patient sample. Overall, these data support the efficacy of GMT in the rehabilitation of executive functioning deficits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 505 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 15%
Researcher 59 11%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 115 22%
Unknown 94 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 244 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 9%
Neuroscience 38 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 4%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 108 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,333,236
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,621
of 7,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,433
of 186,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#30
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.