↓ Skip to main content

Cortical Network Dynamics of Perceptual Decision-Making in the Human Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical Network Dynamics of Perceptual Decision-Making in the Human Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Siegel, Andreas K. Engel, Tobias H. Donner

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires the flexible transformation of sensory evidence about our environment into motor actions. Studies of perceptual decision-making have shown that this transformation is distributed across several widely separated brain regions. Yet, little is known about how decision-making emerges from the dynamic interactions among these regions. Here, we review a series of studies, in which we characterized the cortical network interactions underlying a perceptual decision process in the human brain. We used magnetoencephalography to measure the large-scale cortical population dynamics underlying each of the sub-processes involved in this decision: the encoding of sensory evidence and action plan, the mapping between the two, and the attentional selection of task-relevant evidence. We found that these sub-processes are mediated by neuronal oscillations within specific frequency ranges. Localized gamma-band oscillations in sensory and motor cortices reflect the encoding of the sensory evidence and motor plan. Large-scale oscillations across widespread cortical networks mediate the integrative processes connecting these local networks: Gamma- and beta-band oscillations across frontal, parietal, and sensory cortices serve the selection of relevant sensory evidence and its flexible mapping onto action plans. In sum, our results suggest that perceptual decisions are mediated by oscillatory interactions within overlapping local and large-scale cortical networks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 3%
Germany 9 2%
France 4 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 343 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 27%
Researcher 84 22%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 39 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 28%
Neuroscience 70 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 6%
Computer Science 18 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,390,359
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,985
of 7,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,442
of 180,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#35
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.