↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular and Coordination Training Differentially Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Processing in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
333 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
437 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular and Coordination Training Differentially Improve Cognitive Performance and Neural Processing in Older Adults
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Voelcker-Rehage, Ben Godde, Ursula M. Staudinger

Abstract

Recent studies revealed a positive influence of physical activity on cognitive functioning in older adults. Studies that investigate the behavioral and neurophysiological effects of type and long term duration of physical training, however, are missing. We performed a 12-month longitudinal study to investigate the effects of cardiovascular and coordination training (control group: relaxation and stretching) on cognitive functions (executive control and perceptual speed) in older adults. We analyzed data of 44 participants aged 62-79 years. Participants were trained three times a week for 12 months. Their physical and cognitive performance was tested prior to training, and after 6 and 12 months. Changes in brain activation patterns were investigated using functional MRI. On the behavioral level, both experimental groups improved in executive functioning and perceptual speed but with differential effects on speed and accuracy. In line with the behavioral findings, neurophysiological results for executive control also revealed changes (increases and reductions) in brain activity for both interventions in frontal, parietal, and sensorimotor cortical areas. In contrast to the behavioral findings, neurophysiological changes were linear without indication of a plateau. In both intervention groups, prefrontal areas showed decreased activation after 6 and 12 months when performing an executive control task, as compared to the control group, indicating more efficient information processing. Furthermore, cardiovascular training was associated with an increased activation of the sensorimotor network, whereas coordination training was associated with increased activation in the visual-spatial network. Our data suggest that besides cardiovascular training also other types of physical activity improve cognition of older adults. The mechanisms, however, that underlie the performance changes seem to differ depending on the intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 423 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 17%
Student > Master 70 16%
Researcher 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 100 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 18%
Sports and Recreations 69 16%
Neuroscience 50 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 5%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 118 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,110,260
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#533
of 7,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,822
of 180,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#12
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.