↓ Skip to main content

Eeg-Derived Estimators of Present and Future Cognitive Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eeg-Derived Estimators of Present and Future Cognitive Performance
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maja Stikic, Robin R. Johnson, Daniel J. Levendowski, Djordje P. Popovic, Richard E. Olmstead, Chris Berka

Abstract

Previous electroencephalography (EEG)-based fatigue-related research primarily focused on the association between concurrent cognitive performance and time-locked physiology. The goal of this study was to investigate the capability of EEG to assess the impact of fatigue on both present and future cognitive performance during a 20-min sustained attention task, the 3-choice active vigilance task (3CVT), that requires subjects to discriminate one primary target from two secondary non-target geometric shapes. The current study demonstrated the ability of EEG to estimate not only present, but also future cognitive performance, utilizing a single, combined reaction time (RT), and accuracy performance metric. The correlations between observed and estimated performance, for both present and future performance, were strong (up to 0.89 and 0.79, respectively). The models were able to consistently estimate "unacceptable" performance throughout the entire 3CVT, i.e., excessively missed responses and/or slow RTs, while acceptable performance was recognized less accurately later in the task. The developed models were trained on a relatively large dataset (n = 50 subjects) to increase stability. Cross-validation results suggested the models were not over-fitted. This study indicates that EEG can be used to predict gross-performance degradations 5-15 min in advance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 16 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 24%
Psychology 20 20%
Computer Science 11 11%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,321,186
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,263
of 7,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,411
of 180,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.