↓ Skip to main content

Value and Prediction Error in Medial Frontal Cortex: Integrating the Single-Unit and Systems Levels of Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Value and Prediction Error in Medial Frontal Cortex: Integrating the Single-Unit and Systems Levels of Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Silvetti, Ruth Seurinck, Tom Verguts

Abstract

The role of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in cognition has been extensively investigated with several techniques, including single-unit recordings in rodents and monkeys and EEG and fMRI in humans. This has generated a rich set of data and points of view. Important theoretical functions proposed for ACC are value estimation, error detection, error-likelihood estimation, conflict monitoring, and estimation of reward volatility. A unified view is lacking at this time, however. Here we propose that online value estimation could be the key function underlying these diverse data. This is instantiated in the reward value and prediction model (RVPM). The model contains units coding for the value of cues (stimuli or actions) and units coding for the differences between such values and the actual reward (prediction errors). We exposed the model to typical experimental paradigms from single-unit, EEG, and fMRI research to compare its overall behavior with the data from these studies. The model reproduced the ACC behavior of previous single-unit, EEG, and fMRI studies on reward processing, error processing, conflict monitoring, error-likelihood estimation, and volatility estimation, unifying the interpretations of the role performed by the ACC in some aspects of cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Belgium 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 170 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 10%
Neuroscience 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,257
of 7,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,234
of 180,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.