↓ Skip to main content

Connecting Art and the Brain: An Artist's Perspective on Visual Indeterminacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Connecting Art and the Brain: An Artist's Perspective on Visual Indeterminacy
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Pepperell

Abstract

In this article I will discuss the intersection between art and neuroscience from the perspective of a practicing artist. I have collaborated on several scientific studies into the effects of art on the brain and behavior, looking in particular at the phenomenon of "visual indeterminacy." This is a perceptual state in which subjects fail to recognize objects from visual cues. I will look at the background to this phenomenon, and show how various artists have exploited its effect through the history of art. My own attempts to create indeterminate images will be discussed, including some of the technical problems I faced in trying to manipulate the viewer's perceptual state through paintings. Visual indeterminacy is not widely studied in neuroscience, although references to it can be found in the literature on visual agnosia and object recognition. I will briefly review some of this work and show how my attempts to understand the science behind visual indeterminacy led me to collaborate with psychophysicists and neuroscientists. After reviewing this work, I will discuss the conclusions I have drawn from its findings and consider the problem of how best to integrate neuroscientific methods with artistic knowledge to create truly interdisciplinary approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 27%
Arts and Humanities 19 15%
Neuroscience 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,190,868
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#540
of 7,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,707
of 190,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#11
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.