You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An LCD Monitor with Sufficiently Precise Timing for Research in Vision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peng Wang, Danko Nikolić |
| Abstract |
Until now, liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors have not been used widely for research in vision. Despite their main advantages of continuous illumination and low electromagnetic emission, these monitors had problems with timing and reliability. Here we report that there is at least one new inexpensive 120 Hz model, whose timing and stability is on a par with a benchmark cathode-ray tube monitor, or even better. The onset time was stable across repetitions, 95% confidence interval (the error) of which was <0.01 ms. Brightness was also delivered reliably across repeated presentations (<0.04% error) and across blocks with different durations (<3% error). The LCD monitor seems suitable for many applications in vision research, including the studies that require combined accuracy of timing and intensity of visual stimulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 75 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 12% |
| Engineering | 19 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,372
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,985
of 195,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#69
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.