↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily S. Cross, Louise Kirsch, Luca F. Ticini, Simone Schütz-Bosbach

Abstract

The field of neuroaesthetics attracts attention from neuroscientists and artists interested in the neural underpinnings of esthetic experience. Though less studied than the neuroaesthetics of visual art, dance neuroaesthetics is a particularly rich subfield to explore, as it is informed not only by research on the neurobiology of aesthetics, but also by an extensive literature on how action experience shapes perception. Moreover, it is ideally suited to explore the embodied simulation account of esthetic experience, which posits that activation within sensorimotor areas of the brain, known as the action observation network (AON), is a critical element of the esthetic response. In the present study, we address how observers' esthetic evaluation of dance is related to their perceived physical ability to reproduce the movements they watch. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while evaluating how much they liked and how well they thought they could physically replicate a range of dance movements performed by professional ballet dancers. We used parametric analyses to evaluate brain regions that tracked with degree of liking and perceived physical ability. The findings reveal strongest activation of occipitotemporal and parietal portions of the AON when participants view movements they rate as both esthetically pleasing and difficult to reproduce. As such, these findings begin to illuminate how the embodied simulation account of esthetic experience might apply to watching dance, and provide preliminary evidence as to why some people find enjoyment in an evening at the ballet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 179 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 33 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 32%
Neuroscience 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,313,803
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,169
of 7,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,981
of 180,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#21
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.