↓ Skip to main content

Motivational Salience Modulates Hippocampal Repetition Suppression and Functional Connectivity in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivational Salience Modulates Hippocampal Repetition Suppression and Functional Connectivity in Humans
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Zweynert, Jan Philipp Pade, Torsten Wüstenberg, Philipp Sterzer, Henrik Walter, Constanze I. Seidenbecher, Alan Richardson-Klavehn, Emrah Düzel, Björn Hendrik Schott

Abstract

Repetition suppression (RS) is a rapid decrease of stimulus-related neuronal responses upon repeated presentation of a stimulus. Previous studies have demonstrated that negative emotional salience of stimuli enhances RS. It is, however, unclear how motivational salience of stimuli, such as reward-predicting value, influences RS for complex visual stimuli, and which brain regions might show differences in RS for reward-predicting and neutral stimuli. Here we investigated the influence of motivational salience on RS of complex scenes using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Thirty young healthy volunteers performed a monetary incentive delay task with complex scenes (indoor vs. outdoor) serving as neutral or reward-predicting cue pictures. Each cue picture was presented three times. In line with previous findings, reward anticipation was associated with activations in the ventral striatum, midbrain, and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Stimulus repetition was associated with pronounced RS in ventral visual stream areas like the parahippocampal place area (PPA). An interaction of reward anticipation and RS was specifically observed in the anterior hippocampus, where a response decrease across repetitions was observed for the reward-predicting scenes only. Functional connectivity analysis further revealed specific activity-dependent connectivity increases of the hippocampus and the PPA and OFC. Our results suggest that hippocampal RS is sensitive to reward-predicting properties of stimuli and might therefore reflect a rapid, adaptive neural response mechanism for motivationally salient information.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 77 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 48%
Neuroscience 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,273,442
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,256
of 7,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,173
of 180,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#79
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.