↓ Skip to main content

Auditory Scene Analysis: The Sweet Music of Ambiguity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Sweet Music of Ambiguity
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Pressnitzer, Clara Suied, Shihab A. Shamma

Abstract

In this review paper aimed at the non-specialist, we explore the use that neuroscientists and musicians have made of perceptual illusions based on ambiguity. The pivotal issue is auditory scene analysis (ASA), or what enables us to make sense of complex acoustic mixtures in order to follow, for instance, a single melody in the midst of an orchestra. In general, ASA uncovers the most likely physical causes that account for the waveform collected at the ears. However, the acoustical problem is ill-posed and it must be solved from noisy sensory input. Recently, the neural mechanisms implicated in the transformation of ambiguous sensory information into coherent auditory scenes have been investigated using so-called bistability illusions (where an unchanging ambiguous stimulus evokes a succession of distinct percepts in the mind of the listener). After reviewing some of those studies, we turn to music, which arguably provides some of the most complex acoustic scenes that a human listener will ever encounter. Interestingly, musicians will not always aim at making each physical source intelligible, but rather express one or more melodic lines with a small or large number of instruments. By means of a few musical illustrations and by using a computational model inspired by neuro-physiological principles, we suggest that this relies on a detailed (if perhaps implicit) knowledge of the rules of ASA and of its inherent ambiguity. We then put forward the opinion that some degree perceptual ambiguity may participate in our appreciation of music.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 185 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Researcher 42 21%
Student > Master 26 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 16%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Arts and Humanities 16 8%
Engineering 15 7%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,324,532
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,389
of 7,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,589
of 193,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.