↓ Skip to main content

A Selective Review of Multimodal Fusion Methods in Schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Selective Review of Multimodal Fusion Methods in Schizophrenia
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Sui, Qingbao Yu, Hao He, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Vince D. Calhoun

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SZ) is one of the most cryptic and costly mental disorders in terms of human suffering and societal expenditure (van Os and Kapur, 2009). Though strong evidence for functional, structural, and genetic abnormalities associated with this disease exists, there is yet no replicable finding which has proven accurate enough to be useful in clinical decision making (Fornito et al., 2009), and its diagnosis relies primarily upon symptom assessment (Williams et al., 2010a). It is likely in part that the lack of consistent neuroimaging findings is because most models favor only one data type or do not combine data from different imaging modalities effectively, thus missing potentially important differences which are only partially detected by each modality (Calhoun et al., 2006a). It is becoming increasingly clear that multimodal fusion, a technique which takes advantage of the fact that each modality provides a limited view of the brain/gene and may uncover hidden relationships, is an important tool to help unravel the black box of schizophrenia. In this review paper, we survey a number of multimodal fusion applications which enable us to study the schizophrenia macro-connectome, including brain functional, structural, and genetic aspects and may help us understand the disorder in a more comprehensive and integrated manner. We also provide a table that characterizes these applications by the methods used and compare these methods in detail, especially for multivariate models, which may serve as a valuable reference that helps readers select an appropriate method based on a given research question.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 17%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Psychology 11 9%
Computer Science 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 29 25%