↓ Skip to main content

Functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen B. R. E. Brown, Henk van Steenbergen, Guido P. H. Band, Mischa de Rover, Sander Nieuwenhuis

Abstract

The late positive potential (LPP) is an event-related potential (ERP) component over visual cortical areas that is modulated by the emotional intensity of a stimulus. However, the functional significance of this neural modulation remains elusive. We conducted two experiments in which we studied the relation between LPP amplitude, subsequent perceptual sensitivity to a non-emotional stimulus (Experiment 1) and visual cortical excitability, as reflected by P1/N1 components evoked by this stimulus (Experiment 2). During the LPP modulation elicited by unpleasant stimuli, perceptual sensitivity was not affected. In contrast, we found some evidence for a decreased N1 amplitude during the LPP modulation, a decreased P1 amplitude on trials with a relatively large LPP, and consistent negative (but non-significant) across-subject correlations between the magnitudes of the LPP modulation and corresponding changes in d-prime or P1/N1 amplitude. The results provide preliminary evidence that the LPP reflects a global inhibition of activity in visual cortex, resulting in the selective survival of activity associated with the processing of the emotional stimulus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 22%
Student > Master 36 17%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 94 44%
Neuroscience 39 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,115,171
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,057
of 7,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,585
of 244,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#63
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.