↓ Skip to main content

Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Memory Decline

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Memory Decline
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cotelli, Rosa Manenti, Orazio Zanetti, Carlo Miniussi

Abstract

Non-pharmacological intervention of memory difficulties in healthy older adults, as well as those with brain damage and neurodegenerative disorders, has gained much attention in recent years. The two main reasons that explain this growing interest in memory rehabilitation are the limited efficacy of current drug therapies and the plasticity of the human central nervous and the discovery that during aging, the connections in the brain are not fixed but retain the capacity to change with learning. Moreover, several studies have reported enhanced cognitive performance in patients with neurological disease, following non-invasive brain stimulation [i.e., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation to specific cortical areas]. The present review provides an overview of memory rehabilitation in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and in patients with Alzheimer's disease with particular regard to cognitive rehabilitation interventions focused on memory and non-invasive brain stimulation. Reviewed data suggest that in patients with memory deficits, memory intervention therapy could lead to performance improvements in memory, nevertheless further studies need to be conducted in order to establish the real value of this approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 228 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 59 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,804,165
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#888
of 7,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,856
of 244,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#56
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.