↓ Skip to main content

Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
356 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Brehmer, Helena Westerberg, Lars Bäckman

Abstract

Working memory (WM), a key determinant of many higher-order cognitive functions, declines in old age. Current research attempts to develop process-specific WM training procedures, which may lead to general cognitive improvement. Adaptivity of the training as well as the comparison of training gains to performance changes of an active control group are key factors in evaluating the effectiveness of a specific training program. In the present study, 55 younger adults (20-30 years of age) and 45 older adults (60-70 years of age) received 5 weeks of computerized training on various spatial and verbal WM tasks. Half of the sample received adaptive training (i.e., individually adjusted task difficulty), whereas the other half-worked on the same task material but on a low task difficulty level (active controls). Performance was assessed using criterion, near-transfer, and far-transfer tasks before training, after 5 weeks of intervention, as well as after a 3-month follow-up interval. Results indicate that (a) adaptive training generally led to larger training gains than low-level practice, (b) training and transfer gains were somewhat greater for younger than for older adults in some tasks, but comparable across age groups in other tasks, (c) far-transfer was observed to a test on sustained attention and for a self-rating scale on cognitive functioning in daily life for both young and old, and (d) training gains and transfer effects were maintained across the 3-month follow-up interval across age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 6 1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 522 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 22%
Researcher 74 13%
Student > Master 67 12%
Student > Bachelor 67 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 8%
Other 105 19%
Unknown 78 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 269 48%
Neuroscience 44 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 5%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Other 60 11%
Unknown 110 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#527,896
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#241
of 7,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,051
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#15
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.