↓ Skip to main content

The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagmar Zeithamova, Margaret L. Schlichting, Alison R. Preston

Abstract

A critical aspect of inferential reasoning is the ability to form relationships between items or events that were not experienced together. This review considers different perspectives on the role of the hippocampus in successful inferential reasoning during both memory encoding and retrieval. Intuitively, inference can be thought of as a logical process by which elements of individual existing memories are retrieved and recombined to answer novel questions. Such flexible retrieval is sub-served by the hippocampus and is thought to require specialized hippocampal encoding mechanisms that discretely code events such that event elements are individually accessible from memory. In addition to retrieval-based inference, recent research has also focused on hippocampal processes that support the combination of information acquired across multiple experiences during encoding. This mechanism suggests that by recalling past events during new experiences, connections can be created between newly formed and existing memories. Such hippocampally mediated memory integration would thus underlie the formation of networks of related memories that extend beyond direct experience to anticipate future judgments about the relationships between items and events. We also discuss integrative encoding in the context of emerging evidence linking the hippocampus to the formation of schemas as well as prospective theories of hippocampal function that suggest memories are actively constructed to anticipate future decisions and actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 1%
United States 4 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 321 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 25%
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 38 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 144 42%
Neuroscience 56 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 10%
Computer Science 10 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 64 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,200,252
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,502
of 7,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,831
of 253,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#86
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.