↓ Skip to main content

A composition algorithm based on crossmodal taste-music correspondences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A composition algorithm based on crossmodal taste-music correspondences
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Mesz, Mariano Sigman, Marcos A. Trevisan

Abstract

While there is broad consensus about the structural similarities between language and music, comparably less attention has been devoted to semantic correspondences between these two ubiquitous manifestations of human culture. We have investigated the relations between music and a narrow and bounded domain of semantics: the words and concepts referring to taste sensations. In a recent work, we found that taste words were consistently mapped to musical parameters. Bitter is associated with low-pitched and continuous music (legato), salty is characterized by silences between notes (staccato), sour is high pitched, dissonant and fast and sweet is consonant, slow and soft (Mesz et al., 2011). Here we extended these ideas, in a synergistic dialog between music and science, investigating whether music can be algorithmically generated from taste-words. We developed and implemented an algorithm that exploits a large corpus of classic and popular songs. New musical pieces were produced by choosing fragments from the corpus and modifying them to minimize their distance to the region in musical space that characterizes each taste. In order to test the capability of the produced music to elicit significant associations with the different tastes, musical pieces were produced and judged by a group of non-musicians. Results showed that participants could decode well above chance the taste-word of the composition. We also discuss how our findings can be expressed in a performance bridging music and cognitive science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Linguistics 4 8%
Computer Science 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 16 31%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,722,641
of 24,156,282 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,688
of 7,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,671
of 251,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#126
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,156,282 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.