↓ Skip to main content

The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah E. Hannula, Anthony J. Greene

Abstract

Classic findings from the neuropsychological literature invariably indicated that performances on tests of memory that can be accomplished without conscious awareness were largely spared in amnesia, while those that required conscious retrieval (e.g., via recognition or recall) of information learned in the very same sessions was devastatingly impaired. Based on reports of such dissociations, it was proposed that one of the fundamental distinctions between memory systems is whether or not they support conscious access to remembered content. Only recently have we come to realize that the putative systemic division of labor between conscious and unconscious memory is not so clean. A primary goal of this review is to examine recent evidence that has been advanced against the view that the hippocampus is selectively critical for conscious memory. Along the way, consideration is given to criticisms that have been levied against these findings, potential explanations for differences in the reported results are proposed, and methodological pitfalls in investigations of unconscious memory are discussed. Ultimately, it is concluded that a tipping point has been reached, and that while conscious recollection depends critically on hippocampal integrity, the reach of the hippocampus extends to unconscious aspects of memory performance when relational memory processing and representation are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Germany 4 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 182 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Professor 12 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 46%
Neuroscience 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#13,662,605
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,904
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,976
of 247,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#165
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.