↓ Skip to main content

When Higher Activations Reflect Lower Deactivations: A PET Study in Alzheimer’s Disease during Encoding and Retrieval in Episodic Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Higher Activations Reflect Lower Deactivations: A PET Study in Alzheimer’s Disease during Encoding and Retrieval in Episodic Memory
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Bejanin, Armelle Viard, Gaël Chételat, David Clarys, Frédéric Bernard, Alice Pélerin, Vincent de La Sayette, Francis Eustache, Béatrice Desgranges

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the cerebral substrates of episodic memory disorders in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and investigate patients' hyperactivations frequently reported in the functional imaging literature. It remains unclear whether some of these hyperactivations reflect real increased activity or deactivation disturbances in the default mode network (DMN). Using positron emission tomography ((15)O-H(2)O), cerebral blood flow was measured in 11 AD patients and 12 healthy elderly controls at rest and during encoding and stem-cued recall of verbal items. Subtractions analyses between the target and control conditions were performed and compared between groups. The average signal was extracted in regions showing hyperactivation in AD patients versus controls in both contrasts. To determine whether hyperactivations occurred in regions that were activated or deactivated during the memory tasks, we compared signal intensities between the target conditions versus rest. Our results showed reduced activation in AD patients compared to controls in several core episodic memory regions, including the medial temporal structures, during both encoding and retrieval. Patients also showed hyperactivations compared to controls in a set of brain areas. Further analyses conducted on the signal extracted in these areas indicated that most of these hyperactivations actually reflected a failure of deactivation. Indeed, whereas almost all of these regions were significantly more activated at rest than during the target conditions in controls, only one region presented a similar pattern of deactivation in patients. Altogether, our findings suggest that hyperactivations in AD must be interpreted with caution and may not systematically reflect increased activity. Although there has been evidence supporting the existence of genuine compensatory mechanisms, dysfunction within the DMN may be responsible for part of the apparent hyperactivations reported in the literature on AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Neuroscience 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2012.
All research outputs
#13,366,719
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,061
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,660
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#173
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.