↓ Skip to main content

Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Bartolomeo, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Ana B. Chica

Abstract

Visual neglect is a multi-component syndrome including prominent attentional disorders. Research on the functional mechanisms of neglect is now moving from the description of dissociations in patients' performance to the identification of the possible component deficits and of their interaction with compensatory strategies. In recent years, the dissection of attentional deficits in neglect has progressed in parallel with increasing comprehension of the anatomy and function of large-scale brain networks implicated in attentional processes. This review focuses on the anatomy and putative functions of attentional circuits in the brain, mainly subserved by fronto-parietal networks, with a peculiar although not yet completely elucidated role for the right hemisphere. Recent results are discussed concerning the influence of a non-spatial attentional function, phasic alertness, on conscious perception in normal participants and on conflict resolution in neglect patients. The rapid rate of expansion of our knowledge of these systems raises hopes for the development of effective strategies to improve the functioning of the attentional networks in brain-damaged patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 301 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Researcher 57 18%
Student > Master 43 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 41 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 36%
Neuroscience 51 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,436,548
of 24,233,945 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,160
of 7,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,481
of 251,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#67
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,233,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.