You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developmental dyslexia: dysfunction of a left hemisphere reading network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabio Richlan |
| Abstract |
This mini-review summarizes and integrates findings from recent meta-analyses and original neuroimaging studies on functional brain abnormalities in dyslexic readers. Surprisingly, there is little empirical support for the standard neuroanatomical model of developmental dyslexia, which localizes the primary phonological decoding deficit in left temporo-parietal (TP) regions. Rather, recent evidence points to a dysfunction of a left hemisphere reading network, which includes occipito-temporal (OT), inferior frontal, and inferior parietal regions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 19% |
| Researcher | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 98 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 38 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,401,611
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,917
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,393
of 255,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#102
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.