↓ Skip to main content

Iconic memory requires attention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iconic memory requires attention
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjan Persuh, Boris Genzer, Robert D. Melara

Abstract

Two experiments investigated whether attention plays a role in iconic memory, employing either a change detection paradigm (Experiment 1) or a partial-report paradigm (Experiment 2). In each experiment, attention was taxed during initial display presentation, focusing the manipulation on consolidation of information into iconic memory, prior to transfer into working memory. Observers were able to maintain high levels of performance (accuracy of change detection or categorization) even when concurrently performing an easy visual search task (low load). However, when the concurrent search was made difficult (high load), observers' performance dropped to almost chance levels, while search accuracy held at single-task levels. The effects of attentional load remained the same across paradigms. The results suggest that, without attention, participants consolidate in iconic memory only gross representations of the visual scene, information too impoverished for successful detection of perceptual change or categorization of features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 29%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 41%
Neuroscience 37 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Philosophy 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,233,968
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,488
of 7,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,406
of 247,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#120
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.