Title |
Iconic memory requires attention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00126 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marjan Persuh, Boris Genzer, Robert D. Melara |
Abstract |
Two experiments investigated whether attention plays a role in iconic memory, employing either a change detection paradigm (Experiment 1) or a partial-report paradigm (Experiment 2). In each experiment, attention was taxed during initial display presentation, focusing the manipulation on consolidation of information into iconic memory, prior to transfer into working memory. Observers were able to maintain high levels of performance (accuracy of change detection or categorization) even when concurrently performing an easy visual search task (low load). However, when the concurrent search was made difficult (high load), observers' performance dropped to almost chance levels, while search accuracy held at single-task levels. The effects of attentional load remained the same across paradigms. The results suggest that, without attention, participants consolidate in iconic memory only gross representations of the visual scene, information too impoverished for successful detection of perceptual change or categorization of features. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 29% |
Researcher | 21 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 58 | 41% |
Neuroscience | 37 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Philosophy | 5 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 15% |