↓ Skip to main content

Social top-down response modulation (STORM): a model of the control of mimicry in social interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social top-down response modulation (STORM): a model of the control of mimicry in social interaction
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin Wang, Antonia F. de C. Hamilton

Abstract

As a distinct feature of human social interactions, spontaneous mimicry has been widely investigated in the past decade. Research suggests that mimicry is a subtle and flexible social behavior which plays an important role for communication and affiliation. However, fundamental questions like why and how people mimic still remain unclear. In this paper, we evaluate past theories of why people mimic and the brain systems that implement mimicry in social psychology and cognitive neuroscience. By reviewing recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies on the control of mimicry by social signals, we conclude that the subtlety and sophistication of mimicry in social contexts reflect a social top-down response modulation (STORM) which increases one's social advantage and this mechanism is most likely implemented by medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). We suggest that this STORM account of mimicry is important for our understanding of social behavior and social cognition, and provides implications for future research in autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 360 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 24%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 44 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 57 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 185 49%
Neuroscience 31 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 80 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,772,941
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,291
of 7,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,269
of 251,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#75
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.