↓ Skip to main content

On the impacts of working memory training on executive functioning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the impacts of working memory training on executive functioning
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiina Salminen, Tilo Strobach, Torsten Schubert

Abstract

Recent studies have reported improvements in a variety of cognitive functions following sole working memory (WM) training. In spite of the emergence of several successful training paradigms, the scope of transfer effects has remained mixed. This is most likely due to the heterogeneity of cognitive functions that have been measured and tasks that have been applied. In the present study, we approached this issue systematically by investigating transfer effects from WM training to different aspects of executive functioning. Our training task was a demanding WM task that requires simultaneous performance of a visual and an auditory n-back task, while the transfer tasks tapped WM updating, coordination of the performance of multiple simultaneous tasks (i.e., dual-tasks) and sequential tasks (i.e., task switching), and the temporal distribution of attentional processing. Additionally, we examined whether WM training improves reasoning abilities; a hypothesis that has so far gained mixed support. Following training, participants showed improvements in the trained task as well as in the transfer WM updating task. As for the other executive functions, trained participants improved in a task switching situation and in attentional processing. There was no transfer to the dual-task situation or to reasoning skills. These results, therefore, confirm previous findings that WM can be trained, and additionally, they show that the training effects can generalize to various other tasks tapping on executive functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 4 1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 259 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 25%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 36 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 150 52%
Neuroscience 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Linguistics 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 52 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,715,796
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,343
of 7,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,717
of 246,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#83
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.