↓ Skip to main content

An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily B. Falk, Baldwin M. Way, Agnes J. Jasinska

Abstract

Normative social influences shape nearly every aspect of our lives, yet the biological processes mediating the impact of these social influences on behavior remain incompletely understood. In this Hypothesis, we outline a theoretical framework and an integrative research approach to the study of social influences on the brain and genetic moderators of such effects. First, we review neuroimaging evidence linking social influence and conformity to the brain's reward system. We next review neuroimaging evidence linking social punishment (exclusion) to brain systems involved in the experience of pain, as well as evidence linking exclusion to conformity. We suggest that genetic variants that increase sensitivity to social cues may predispose individuals to be more sensitive to either social rewards or punishments (or potentially both), which in turn increases conformity and susceptibility to normative social influences more broadly. To this end, we review evidence for genetic moderators of neurochemical responses in the brain, and suggest ways in which genes and pharmacology may modulate sensitivity to social influences. We conclude by proposing an integrative imaging genetics approach to the study of brain mediators and genetic modulators of a variety of social influences on human attitudes, beliefs, and actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 31%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 41%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,559,476
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,962
of 7,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,911
of 250,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#104
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.