↓ Skip to main content

Top-down modulation of the perception of other people in schizophrenia and autism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Top-down modulation of the perception of other people in schizophrenia and autism
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Cook, Guillaume Barbalat, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

Abstract

Accurately and efficiently perceiving social cues such as body movements and facial expressions is important in social interaction. Accurate social perception of this kind does not solely rely on "bottom-up" visual processing but is also subject to modulation by "top-down" signals. For example, if instructed to look for signs of happiness rather than fear, participants are more likely to categorize facial expressions as happy-this prior expectation biases subsequent perception. Top-down modulation is also important in our reactions to others. For example, top-down control over imitation plays an important role in the development of smooth and harmonious social interactions. This paper highlights the importance of top-down modulation in our perception of, and reactions to, others. We discuss evidence that top-down modulation of social perception and imitation is atypical in Autism Spectrum Conditions and in schizophrenia, and we consider the effect this may have on the development of social interactions for individuals with these developmental disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 209 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 30%
Student > Master 34 16%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 33%
Neuroscience 36 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,023,039
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,507
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,332
of 247,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#91
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.