You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Joint perception: gaze and social context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel C. Richardson, Chris N. H. Street, Joanne Y. M. Tan, Natasha Z. Kirkham, Merrit A. Hoover, Arezou Ghane Cavanaugh |
| Abstract |
We found that the way people looked at images was influenced by their belief that others were looking too. If participants believed that an unseen other person was also looking at what they could see, it shifted the balance of their gaze between negative and positive images. The direction of this shift depended upon whether participants thought that later they would be compared against the other person or would be collaborating with them. Changes in the social context influenced both gaze and memory processes, and were not due just to participants' belief that they are looking at the same images, but also to the belief that they are doing the same task. We believe that the phenomenon of joint perception reveals the pervasive and subtle effect of social context upon cognitive and perceptual processes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 83% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 122 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 47% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,007,020
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,451
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,299
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#119
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.