You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Better Ways to Improve Standards in Brain-Behavior Correlation Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Benjamin De Haas, Geraint Rees |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 30% |
| Researcher | 27 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,343,339
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,485
of 7,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,842
of 251,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#117
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.