↓ Skip to main content

Neural synchrony within the motor system: what have we learned so far?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural synchrony within the motor system: what have we learned so far?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernadette C. M. van Wijk, Peter J. Beek, Andreas Daffertshofer

Abstract

Synchronization of neural activity is considered essential for information processing in the nervous system. Both local and inter-regional synchronization are omnipresent in different frequency regimes and relate to a variety of behavioral and cognitive functions. Over the years, many studies have sought to elucidate the question how alpha/mu, beta, and gamma synchronization contribute to motor control. Here, we review these studies with the purpose to delineate what they have added to our understanding of the neural control of movement. We highlight important findings regarding oscillations in primary motor cortex, synchronization between cortex and spinal cord, synchronization between cortical regions, as well as abnormal synchronization patterns in a selection of motor dysfunctions. The interpretation of synchronization patterns benefits from combining results of invasive and non-invasive recordings, different data analysis tools, and modeling work. Importantly, although synchronization is deemed to play a vital role, it is not the only mechanism for neural communication. Spike timing and rate coding act together during motor control and should therefore both be accounted for when interpreting movement-related activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 7 2%
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 365 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 23%
Researcher 73 19%
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 86 22%
Psychology 54 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 11%
Engineering 39 10%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 81 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,134,992
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,840
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,200
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#163
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.