↓ Skip to main content

Parallel ICA identifies sub-components of resting state networks that covary with behavioral indices

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parallel ICA identifies sub-components of resting state networks that covary with behavioral indices
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy B. Meier, Joseph C. Wildenberg, Jingyu Liu, Jiayu Chen, Vince D. Calhoun, Bharat B. Biswal, Mary E. Meyerand, Rasmus M. Birn, Vivek Prabhakaran

Abstract

Parallel Independent Component Analysis (para-ICA) is a multivariate method that can identify complex relationships between different data modalities by simultaneously performing Independent Component Analysis on each data set while finding mutual information between the two data sets. We use para-ICA to test the hypothesis that spatial sub-components of common resting state networks (RSNs) covary with specific behavioral measures. Resting state scans and a battery of behavioral indices were collected from 24 younger adults. Group ICA was performed and common RSNs were identified by spatial correlation to publically available templates. Nine RSNs were identified and para-ICA was run on each network with a matrix of behavioral measures serving as the second data type. Five networks had spatial sub-components that significantly correlated with behavioral components. These included a sub-component of the temporo-parietal attention network that differentially covaried with different trial-types of a sustained attention task, sub-components of default mode networks that covaried with attention and working memory tasks, and a sub-component of the bilateral frontal network that split the left inferior frontal gyrus into three clusters according to its cytoarchitecture that differentially covaried with working memory performance. Additionally, we demonstrate the validity of para-ICA in cases with unbalanced dimensions using simulated data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 23%
Neuroscience 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Engineering 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,735,403
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,901
of 7,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,241
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#209
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.