↓ Skip to main content

Functional magnetic resonance imaging during emotion recognition in social anxiety disorder: an activation likelihood meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional magnetic resonance imaging during emotion recognition in social anxiety disorder: an activation likelihood meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Coenraad J. Hattingh, J. Ipser, S. A. Tromp, S. Syal, C. Lochner, S. J. Brooks, D. J. Stein

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by abnormal fear and anxiety in social situations. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a brain imaging technique that can be used to demonstrate neural activation to emotionally salient stimuli. However, no attempt has yet been made to statistically collate fMRI studies of brain activation, using the activation likelihood-estimate (ALE) technique, in response to emotion recognition tasks in individuals with SAD. Methods: A systematic search of fMRI studies of neural responses to socially emotive cues in SAD was undertaken. ALE meta-analysis, a voxel-based meta-analytic technique, was used to estimate the most significant activations during emotional recognition. Results: Seven studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis, constituting a total of 91 subjects with SAD, and 93 healthy controls. The most significant areas of activation during emotional vs. neutral stimuli in individuals with SAD compared to controls were: bilateral amygdala, left medial temporal lobe encompassing the entorhinal cortex, left medial aspect of the inferior temporal lobe encompassing perirhinal cortex and parahippocampus, right anterior cingulate, right globus pallidus, and distal tip of right postcentral gyrus. Conclusion: The results are consistent with neuroanatomic models of the role of the amygdala in fear conditioning, and the importance of the limbic circuitry in mediating anxiety symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 203 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 41%
Neuroscience 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#19,370,359
of 23,975,876 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,236
of 7,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,287
of 286,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#764
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.