You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Error awareness and the insula: links to neurological and psychiatric diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilmann A. Klein, Markus Ullsperger, Claudia Danielmeier |
| Abstract |
Becoming aware of errors that one has committed might be crucial for strategic behavioral and neuronal adjustments to avoid similar errors in the future. This review addresses conscious error perception ("error awareness") in healthy subjects as well as the relationship between error awareness and neurological and psychiatric diseases. We first discuss the main findings on error awareness in healthy subjects. A brain region, that appears consistently involved in error awareness processes, is the insula, which also provides a link to the clinical conditions reviewed here. Then we focus on a neurological condition whose core element is an impaired awareness for neurological consequences of a disease: anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP). The insular cortex has been implicated in both error awareness and AHP, with anterior insular regions being involved in conscious error processing and more posterior areas being related to AHP. In addition to cytoarchitectonic and connectivity data, this reflects a functional and structural gradient within the insula from anterior to posterior. Furthermore, studies dealing with error awareness and lack of insight in a number of psychiatric diseases are reported. Especially in schizophrenia, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) the performance monitoring system seems impaired, thus conscious error perception might be altered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 21% |
| Researcher | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 104 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 62 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,694,515
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,266
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,583
of 293,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#203
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.