↓ Skip to main content

Dietary fat induces sustained reward response in the human brain without primary taste cortex discrimination

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary fat induces sustained reward response in the human brain without primary taste cortex discrimination
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hélène Tzieropoulos, Andreas Rytz, Julie Hudry, Johannes le Coutre

Abstract

To disentangle taste from reward responses in the human gustatory cortex, we combined high density electro-encephalography with a gustometer delivering tastant puffs to the tip of the tongue. Stimuli were pure tastants (salt solutions at two concentrations), caloric emulsions (two milk preparations identical in composition except for fat content) and a mixture of high fat milk with the lowest salt concentration. Early event-related potentials (ERPs) showed a dose-response effect for increased taste intensity, with higher amplitude and shorter latency for high compared to low salt concentration, but not for increased fat content. However, the amplitude and distribution of late potentials were modulated by fat content independently of reported intensity and discrimination. Neural source estimation revealed a sustained activation of reward areas to the two high-fat stimuli. The results suggest calorie detection through specific sensors on the tongue independent of perceived taste. Finally, amplitude variation of the first peak in the event-related potential to the different stimuli correlated with papilla density, suggesting a higher discrimination power for subjects with more fungiform papillae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 28%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Engineering 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,051
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,972
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#765
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.