You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Short-interval intracortical inhibition is not affected by varying visual feedback in an isometric task in biceps brachii muscle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timo Rantalainen, Ashleigh Weier, Michael Leung, Chris Brandner, Michael Spittle, Dawson Kidgell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,745,370
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,903
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,251
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#645
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.