↓ Skip to main content

Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elger L. Abrahamse, Marit F. L. Ruitenberg, Elian de Kleine, Willem B. Verwey

Abstract

Work with the discrete sequence production (DSP) task has provided a substantial literature on discrete sequencing skill over the last decades. The purpose of the current article is to provide a comprehensive overview of this literature and of the theoretical progress that it has prompted. We start with a description of the DSP task and the phenomena that are typically observed with it. Then we propose a cognitive model, the dual processor model (DPM), which explains performance of (skilled) discrete key-press sequences. Key features of this model are the distinction between a cognitive processor and a motor system (i.e., motor buffer and motor processor), the interplay between these two processing systems, and the possibility to execute familiar sequences in two different execution modes. We further discuss how this model relates to several related sequence skill research paradigms and models, and we outline outstanding questions for future research throughout the paper. We conclude by sketching a tentative neural implementation of the DPM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor 12 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 34%
Neuroscience 28 16%
Engineering 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,148,117
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,842
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,719
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#529
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.