You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of self-other representations and vicarious experiences of touch in mirror-touch synesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Banissy, Jamie Ward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#750,023
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#334
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,653
of 293,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#40
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.