↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inyong Choi, Siddharth Rajaram, Lenny A. Varghese, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham

Abstract

Selective auditory attention is essential for human listeners to be able to communicate in multi-source environments. Selective attention is known to modulate the neural representation of the auditory scene, boosting the representation of a target sound relative to the background, but the strength of this modulation, and the mechanisms contributing to it, are not well understood. Here, listeners performed a behavioral experiment demanding sustained, focused spatial auditory attention while we measured cortical responses using electroencephalography (EEG). We presented three concurrent melodic streams; listeners were asked to attend and analyze the melodic contour of one of the streams, randomly selected from trial to trial. In a control task, listeners heard the same sound mixtures, but performed the contour judgment task on a series of visual arrows, ignoring all auditory streams. We found that the cortical responses could be fit as weighted sum of event-related potentials evoked by the stimulus onsets in the competing streams. The weighting to a given stream was roughly 10 dB higher when it was attended compared to when another auditory stream was attended; during the visual task, the auditory gains were intermediate. We then used a template-matching classification scheme to classify single-trial EEG results. We found that in all subjects, we could determine which stream the subject was attending significantly better than by chance. By directly quantifying the effect of selective attention on auditory cortical responses, these results reveal that focused auditory attention both suppresses the response to an unattended stream and enhances the response to an attended stream. The single-trial classification results add to the growing body of literature suggesting that auditory attentional modulation is sufficiently robust that it could be used as a control mechanism in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 170 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 25%
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 38 21%
Engineering 30 16%
Psychology 26 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,701,336
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,279
of 7,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,695
of 289,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#762
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.