↓ Skip to main content

Acute stress selectively reduces reward sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute stress selectively reduces reward sensitivity
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa H. Berghorst, Ryan Bogdan, Michael J. Frank, Diego A. Pizzagalli

Abstract

Stress may promote the onset of psychopathology by disrupting reward processing. However, the extent to which stress impairs reward processing, rather than incentive processing more generally, is unclear. To evaluate the specificity of stress-induced reward processing disruption, 100 psychiatrically healthy females were administered a probabilistic stimulus selection task (PSST) that enabled comparison of sensitivity to reward-driven (Go) and punishment-driven (NoGo) learning under either "no stress" or "stress" (threat-of-shock) conditions. Cortisol samples and self-report measures were collected. Contrary to hypotheses, the groups did not differ significantly in task performance or cortisol reactivity. However, further analyses focusing only on individuals under "stress" who were high responders with regard to both cortisol reactivity and self-reported negative affect revealed reduced reward sensitivity relative to individuals tested in the "no stress" condition; importantly, these deficits were reward-specific. Overall, findings provide preliminary evidence that stress-reactive individuals show diminished sensitivity to reward, but not punishment, under stress. While such results highlight the possibility that stress-induced anhedonia might be an important mechanism linking stress to affective disorders, future studies are necessary to confirm this conjecture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 242 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 23%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 44%
Neuroscience 34 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 57 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,967,708
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,420
of 7,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,637
of 280,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#350
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.