↓ Skip to main content

The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvia A. Morelli, Matthew D. Lieberman

Abstract

Although many studies have examined the neural basis of empathy, relatively little is known about how empathic processes are affected by different attentional conditions. Thus, we examined whether instructions to empathize might amplify responses in empathy-related regions and whether cognitive load would diminish the involvement of these regions. Thirty-two participants completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging session assessing empathic responses to individuals experiencing happy, sad, and anxious events. Stimuli were presented under three conditions: watching naturally, actively empathizing, and under cognitive load. Across analyses, we found evidence for a core set of neural regions that support empathic processes (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, DMPFC; medial prefrontal cortex, MPFC; temporoparietal junction, TPJ; amygdala; ventral anterior insula, AI; and septal area, SA). Two key regions-the ventral AI and SA-were consistently active across all attentional conditions, suggesting that they are automatically engaged during empathy. In addition, watching vs. empathizing with targets was not markedly different and instead led to similar subjective and neural responses to others' emotional experiences. In contrast, cognitive load reduced the subjective experience of empathy and diminished neural responses in several regions related to empathy and social cognition (DMPFC, MPFC, TPJ, and amygdala). The results reveal how attention impacts empathic processes and provides insight into how empathy may unfold in everyday interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 232 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 25%
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 121 48%
Neuroscience 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 39 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,966,283
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,774
of 7,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,847
of 291,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#373
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.