You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of group membership on the neural correlates involved in empathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Eres, Pascal Molenberghs |
| Abstract |
Empathy involves affective, cognitive, and emotion regulative components. The affective component relies on the sharing of emotional states with others and is discussed here in relation to the human Mirror System. On the other hand, the cognitive component is related to understanding the mental states of others and draws upon literature surrounding Theory of Mind (ToM). The final component, emotion regulation, depends on executive function and is responsible for managing the degree to which explicit empathic responses are made. This mini-review provides information on how each of the three components is individually affected by group membership and how this leads to in-group bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,000,543
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#443
of 7,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,871
of 290,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#60
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.