↓ Skip to main content

The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
twitter
24 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
848 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J. Robinson, Katherine Vytal, Brian R. Cornwell, Christian Grillon

Abstract

Anxiety disorders constitute a sizeable worldwide health burden with profound social and economic consequences. The symptoms are wide-ranging; from hyperarousal to difficulties with concentrating. This latter effect falls under the broad category of altered cognitive performance which is the focus of this review. Specifically, we examine the interaction between anxiety and cognition focusing on the translational threat of unpredictable shock paradigm; a method previously used to characterize emotional responses and defensive mechanisms that is now emerging as valuable tool for examining the interaction between anxiety and cognition. In particular, we compare the impact of threat of shock on cognition in humans to that of pathological anxiety disorders. We highlight that both threat of shock and anxiety disorders promote mechanisms associated with harm avoidance across multiple levels of cognition (from perception to attention to learning and executive function)-a "hot" cognitive function which can be both adaptive and maladaptive depending upon the circumstances. This mechanism comes at a cost to other functions such as working memory, but leaves some functions, such as planning, unperturbed. We also highlight a number of cognitive effects that differ across anxiety disorders and threat of shock. These discrepant effects are largely seen in "cold" cognitive functions involving control mechanisms and may reveal boundaries between adaptive (e.g., response to threat) and maladaptive (e.g., pathological) anxiety. We conclude by raising a number of unresolved questions regarding the role of anxiety in cognition that may provide fruitful avenues for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 848 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 836 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 151 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 15%
Student > Master 113 13%
Researcher 71 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 6%
Other 123 15%
Unknown 219 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 278 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 8%
Neuroscience 69 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 4%
Other 123 15%
Unknown 243 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#115,053
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 7,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#633
of 291,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.