↓ Skip to main content

Measuring attention using the Posner cuing paradigm: the role of across and within trial target probabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring attention using the Posner cuing paradigm: the role of across and within trial target probabilities
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana A. Hayward, Jelena Ristic

Abstract

Numerous studies conducted within the recent decades have utilized the Posner cuing paradigm for eliciting, measuring, and theoretically characterizing attentional orienting. However, the data from recent studies suggest that the Posner cuing task might not provide an unambiguous measure of attention, as reflexive spatial orienting has been found to interact with extraneous processes engaged by the task's typical structure, i.e., the probability of target presence across trials, which affects tonic alertness, and the probability of target presence within trials, which affects voluntary temporal preparation. To understand the contribution of each of these two processes to the measurement of attentional orienting we assessed their individual and combined effects on reflexive attention elicited by a spatially nonpredictive peripheral cue. Our results revealed that the magnitude of spatial orienting was modulated by joint changes in the global probability of target presence across trials and the local probability of target presence within trials, while the time course of spatial orienting was susceptible to changes in the probability of target presence across trials. These data thus raise important questions about the choice of task parameters within the Posner cuing paradigm and their role in both the measurement and theoretical attributions of the observed attentional effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 51%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,685,056
of 24,676,547 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,575
of 7,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,724
of 291,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#352
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,676,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.