↓ Skip to main content

Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter G. Enticott, Hayley A. Kennedy, Nicole J. Rinehart, John L. Bradshaw, Bruce J. Tonge, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Paul B. Fitzgerald

Abstract

The mirror neuron hypothesis of autism is highly controversial, in part because there are conflicting reports as to whether putative indices of mirror system activity are actually deficient in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Recent evidence suggests that a typical putative mirror system response may be seen in people with an ASD when there is a degree of social relevance to the visual stimuli used to elicit that response. Individuals with ASD (n = 32) and matched neurotypical controls (n = 32) completed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment in which the left primary motor cortex (M1) was stimulated during the observation of static hands, individual (i.e., one person) hand actions, and interactive (i.e., two person) hand actions. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous, and used to generate an index of interpersonal motor resonance (IMR; a putative measure of mirror system activity) during action observation. There was no difference between ASD and NT groups in the level of IMR during the observation of these actions. These findings provide evidence against a global mirror system deficit in ASD, and this evidence appears to extend beyond stimuli that have social relevance. Attentional and visual processing influences may be important for understanding the apparent role of IMR in the pathophysiology of ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 39%
Neuroscience 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,227,026
of 24,307,517 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#569
of 7,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,777
of 289,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#94
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,307,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.