↓ Skip to main content

Age and gender dependent development of Theory of Mind in 6- to 8-years old children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age and gender dependent development of Theory of Mind in 6- to 8-years old children
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia I. Calero, Alejo Salles, Mariano Semelman, Mariano Sigman

Abstract

The ability to attribute different mental states to distinct individuals, or Theory of Mind (ToM), is widely believed to be developed mostly during preschool years. How different factors such as gender, number of siblings, or coarse personality traits affect this development is not entirely agreed upon. Here, we introduce a computerized version of the scaled ToM suite of tasks introduced by Wellman and Liu (2004), which allows us to meaningfully test ToM development on children 6 to 8-years old. We find that kids this age are still not entirely proficient in all ToM tasks, and continue to show a progression of performance with age. By testing this new age range, too, we are able to observe a significant advantage of girls over boys in ToM performance. Other factors such as number of siblings, birth order, and coarse personality traits show no significant relation with the ToM task results. Finally, we introduce a novel way to quantify the scaling property of the suite involving a sequence of set inclusions on one hand and a comparison between specially tailored sets of logistic models on the other. These measures confirm the validity of the scale in the 6- to 8-years old range.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 217 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 46%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 57 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#861,590
of 25,225,182 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#382
of 7,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,731
of 293,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#51
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.