↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical Brain Networks Active in Approach and Avoidance Goal Pursuit

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hierarchical Brain Networks Active in Approach and Avoidance Goal Pursuit
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M. Spielberg, Wendy Heller, Gregory A. Miller

Abstract

Effective approach/avoidance goal pursuit is critical for attaining long-term health and well-being. Research on the neural correlates of key goal-pursuit processes (e.g., motivation) has long been of interest, with lateralization in prefrontal cortex being a particularly fruitful target of investigation. However, this literature has often been limited by a lack of spatial specificity and has not delineated the precise aspects of approach/avoidance motivation involved. Additionally, the relationships among brain regions (i.e., network connectivity) vital to goal-pursuit remain largely unexplored. Specificity in location, process, and network relationship is vital for moving beyond gross characterizations of function and identifying the precise cortical mechanisms involved in motivation. The present paper integrates research using more spatially specific methodologies (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging) with the rich psychological literature on approach/avoidance to propose an integrative network model that takes advantage of the strengths of each of these literatures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor 13 9%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 45%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,566,581
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#723
of 7,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,858
of 293,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#119
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.